people NOT to post their guesses publicly until *after* everyone's answers
are in, to ensure subjects' answers are independent, i.e., they aren't
influenced by other subjects' answers.
> Some of us may think or hear different. We'll see it from the replies,
> although we won't be able to get a scientific proof here as I mentined
> it iin another thread.
>
> On febr. 1, 00:33, "Steven Sullivan" <ssu...@panix.com> wrote:
>> Difficult? I thought the differences between lossy and lossles, between
>> standard rez and high, were supposed to be obvious?
>>
>>
>>
>> > I can add/change/omit tracks or give more info if the test proves to
>> > be too difficult. We are not in a hurry so take your listening time. I
>> > may invite the best assessor for a bottle of Hungarian wine during his
>> > next visit to Budapest :-)
>>
>> > On jan. 31, 22:20, elshagon <elsha...@msn.com> wrote:
>> >> Too bad there's not an ac3 (dolby digital) track also, that's where
>> >> you see a huge drop in quality.
>>
>> >> On Jan 31, 2:00 am, "Dave Cooper" <davecooper1...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >> > Oh good, an ambisonic test, oh sorry read it wrong lol
>>
>> >> > I'm offering you a WXYZ comparison test to check the audio
>> >> evaluation
>> >> > capability of your ears and mind. The hotlinked Hotfile link below
>> >> > leads you to a DVD-audio disc image that contains four 5.1 24/96
>> >> > tracks of the same audio material encoded as:
>>
>> >> > - unaltered original MLP 5.1 24/96,
>> >> > - DTS 5.1 (755 kbps),
>> >> > - DTS 5.1 (1510 kbps),
>> >> > - DTS 24/96 5.1 (1510 kbps).
>>
>> >> > DTS-HD MAS 2.50.20 was used for DTS encoding and AudioMuxer with
>> >> > ArcSoft DTS decoder was used for DTS decoding.
>>
>> >> > Your task is to determine the correct encoding order, at least to
>> >> find
>> >> > the original without using audio evaluating softwares. You can PM
>> me
>> >> > your guess and I'll send you the right answer back. Bravehearts can
>> >> > reply publicly. Btw, I meant this to be a funny game so don't take
>> >> it
>> >> > too seriously (although there is no trick or scam in the testing
>> >> > material).
>>
>> >> >http://hotfile.com/list/1973773/7086aff
>>
>> >> > --
>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >> Groups "SurroundSound" group.
>> >> > To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >> SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
>> >> > For more options, visit this group
>> >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
>>
>> >> > -----
>> >> > No virus found in this message.
>> >> > Checked by AVG -www.avg.com
>> >> > Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4776 - Release Date:
>> >> 01/30/12- Id zett sz veg elrejt se -
>>
>> >> - Id zett sz veg megjelen t se -
>>
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups
>> > "SurroundSound" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> >http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound- Idézett szöveg elrejtése
>> -
>>
>> - Idézett szöveg megjelenítése -
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "SurroundSound" group.
> To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
No comments:
Post a Comment