Pages

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Re: [SurroundSound] Re: Can you tell the difference and find the original?

here we go again you can deal with this twat as I'm too cowardly ;-))

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:02 PM, grill <grill@index.hu> wrote:
Some of us may think or hear different. We'll see it from the replies,
although we won't be able to get a scientific proof here as I mentined
it iin another thread.

On febr. 1, 00:33, "Steven Sullivan" <ssu...@panix.com> wrote:
> Difficult?  I thought the differences between lossy and lossles, between
> standard rez and high,  were supposed to be obvious?
>
>
>
> > I can add/change/omit tracks or give more info if the test proves to
> > be too difficult. We are not in a hurry so take your listening time. I
> > may invite the best assessor for a bottle of Hungarian wine during his
> > next visit to Budapest :-)
>
> > On jan. 31, 22:20, elshagon <elsha...@msn.com> wrote:
> >> Too bad there's not an ac3 (dolby digital) track also, that's where
> >> you see a huge drop in quality.
>
> >> On Jan 31, 2:00 am, "Dave Cooper" <davecooper1...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >> > Oh good, an ambisonic test, oh sorry read it wrong lol
>
> >> > I'm offering you a WXYZ comparison test to check the audio
> >> evaluation
> >> > capability of your ears and mind. The hotlinked Hotfile link below
> >> > leads you to a DVD-audio disc image that contains four 5.1 24/96
> >> > tracks of the same audio material encoded as:
>
> >> > - unaltered original MLP 5.1 24/96,
> >> > - DTS 5.1 (755 kbps),
> >> > - DTS 5.1 (1510 kbps),
> >> > - DTS 24/96 5.1 (1510 kbps).
>
> >> > DTS-HD MAS 2.50.20 was used for DTS encoding and AudioMuxer with
> >> > ArcSoft DTS decoder was used for DTS decoding.
>
> >> > Your task is to determine the correct encoding order, at least to
> >> find
> >> > the original without using audio evaluating softwares. You can PM me
> >> > your guess and I'll send you the right answer back. Bravehearts can
> >> > reply publicly. Btw, I meant this to be a funny game so don't take
> >> it
> >> > too seriously (although there is no trick or scam in the testing
> >> > material).
>
> >> >http://hotfile.com/list/1973773/7086aff
>
> >> > --
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> Groups "SurroundSound" group.
> >> > To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> >> > For more options, visit this group
> >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
>
> >> > -----
> >> > No virus found in this message.
> >> > Checked by AVG -www.avg.com
> >> > Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4776 - Release Date:
> >> 01/30/12- Id zett sz veg elrejt se -
>
> >> - Id zett sz veg megjelen t se -
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "SurroundSound" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound- Idézett szöveg elrejtése -
>
> - Idézett szöveg megjelenítése -

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound

No comments:

Post a Comment