Probably more than 2 different animals and some veg & minerals too I
expect :lol:
Variable bit rate dependent on bandwidth sounds like a proper location
lottery but also a case of only those who can afford it get it. iTunes
sucks! I wont have anything to do with it.
On May 25, 5:26 pm, August Bleed <bleed...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Apple thing sounds nearly identical to the patent that Neil Young was
> applying for: ie HD music at a variable bitrate via the cloud to portable
> devices. While this seems to be the direction the industry is going I
> personally am still a big fan of having my own media not dependent upon any
> kind of connection to play it. I consider even a place on my hard drive
> more of a concrete ownership experience than anything in the cloud. Of
> course, what Apple considers HD and what we might consider HD may be two
> completely different animals.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Steven Sullivan <ssu...@panix.com> wrote:
> > What's interesting (to me) is 1) that Apple is getting into Spotify-type
> > music delivery at all; they've already dipped their toe in with iTunes
> > Match (which lets you play your own music collection from the cloud and
> > upgrades the quality if your version is <256kbps AAC), and what's it all
> > mean for the iTunes Store? and 2) that they intend to maintain an archive
> > 'HD' quality tracks for delivery over this system (delivery to be at
> > various quality levels, depending on bandwidth)
>
> > Once this gets going shouldn't be too hard to tell if a stream is truly
> > 'HD' or not.
>
> > > Marketing nonsense. I wouldn't believe a word they say.
>
> > > On May 24, 10:38 pm, Tab Cursor <tabcur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> This is a cool thread.
>
> > >> I want to point out another "rumour?" I just got with my Home Theater
> > >> Magazine sub this month.
>
> > >> "A New Apple Audio File
>
> > >> format would allow adaptive streaming of cloud-based content at
> > >> different
> > >> levels of quality, reports 'The Guardian' Said one anonymous source
> > >> quoted
> > >> by the British daily, 'All of a sudden, all you audio from iTunes is in
> > >> HD
> > >> rather than AAC'..."
>
> > >> Since Apple has all the revenue, why not? After all, what are all those
> > >> Petabytes for?
>
> > >> On Friday, May 18, 2012 3:21:03 PM UTC-7, Blee...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > >> > Here is an article on the Dolby TrueHD format and how they intend to
> > >> > upsample music to 24/96 for BluRay.
> > >> >http://www.stereophile.com/content/dolby174-upsamples-apodizes-truehd
> > >> > --
> > >> > August
> > >> > Bleed, Inc.
> > >> > Selling Art Is Tying Your Ego To a Leash And Walking It Like a Dog
>
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > "SurroundSound" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "SurroundSound" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
>
> --
> August
> Bleed, Inc.
> Selling Art Is Tying Your Ego To a Leash And Walking It Like a Dog
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
Friday, May 25, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment