of PS3 rips...
On Sep 2, 3:36 pm, MrMalice <MrMalic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Has anyone attempted to burn the linked ISO to DVD? If so, what burning app,
> what playback device/software, and what results?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Daun Polod <daunpo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Can i have the link too? Thanks...
>
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:32 AM, August Bleed <bleed...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> If both of you didn't receive copies just drop me a line and Ill try
> >> again.
>
> >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:30 AM, August Bleed <bleed...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >>> You both should have received links to the file. I should note I found
> >>> the linked torrent at another site than the original which seemed to
> >>> disappear from the internet. So this version is not labeled like the former
> >>> one I had which had indicated it was an up mix. this one indicates nothing
> >>> and doesn't really note the album or artist. You should enjoy the iso for
> >>> kicks and giggles. It certainly made me think HOW bad I need the new
> >>> SACD...since someone seems to have done a relatively competent job at their
> >>> home computer...maybe they should have hired this guy/gal instead of
> >>> guthrie...maybe then the immersion sets would only cost 100 bucks...lol
>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:19 AM, MrMalice <MrMalic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> August,
>
> >>>> Seconds on requesting a private link to the WYWH.
>
> >>>> Thanks in advance,
>
> >>>> MrM
>
> >>>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Stephen Disney <
> >>>> sthunderroc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> Many were burned by unlabelled upmixes and fakes across the board for
> >>>>> years. This is nothing new and regrettably unavoidable... except if you
> >>>>> know your source. I will send you a private link. Also... have you
> >>>>> updated to the latest foobar plugin version. Maybe it was a cpu usage
> >>>>> issue?
>
> >>>>> Last thing I will say is that if you trust our members here... then you
> >>>>> trust the guys doing most of these releases.
>
> >>>>> August... can you link me in private to the WYWH upmix?
> >>>>> S
>
> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:42 PM, August Bleed <bleed...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >>>>>> I downloaded both the APP and PF upmixes to SACD that are being
> >>>>>> discussed here. We are all probably aware these came from (supposedly) Q8
> >>>>>> quad tapes that were at one time converted to DVD-A. I downloaded them
> >>>>>> fully aware that they were fakes, but I love both the albums and figured
> >>>>>> what the heck lets see how well they did...Well, the APP wasn't really any
> >>>>>> different from the HDAD...however, PF WYWH is leagues different from the
> >>>>>> DVD-A out there. Almost sounds like a studio release. I almost thought I'd
> >>>>>> gotten a pre release version of the new release it's pretty remarkable labor
> >>>>>> of love. Not to say that it shouldn't be labeled as an upmix (and I believe
> >>>>>> the sources I have were identified as such)...but for something someone
> >>>>>> likely made at home it sounds very good.
>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:25 AM, pj-mckay <johnmc...@btinternet.com>wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> To Stephen and Hardlock Cafe...
>
> >>>>>>> I agree with what you're saying and I trust you guys implicitely but
> >>>>>>> the PS3 rip thing is clearly in its infancy and the availability of
> >>>>>>> rips is a great thing for the future. I think the audio market will
> >>>>>>> have to look at releasing in file form at some point, especially with
> >>>>>>> all this work. Media players, Oppo with disk/file access, etc and
> >>>>>>> get
> >>>>>>> away from optical is the future in my mind. I dont mind paying for
> >>>>>>> good quality but some of the recent prices being quoted are
> >>>>>>> ridiculous. All your comments are appreciated.
>
> >>>>>>> Excluding you guys and the folk you say you trust.... someone will
> >>>>>>> release standard stuff packaged and named wrongly, and some of us
> >>>>>>> might be fooled. I guess you could say that's tough, and I guess we
> >>>>>>> all might need to restrict ourselves to 'good guys' but I'm fearing
> >>>>>>> us
> >>>>>>> being duped and scoffed at. Again; so long as I have the actual
> >>>>>>> SACD
> >>>>>>> I will be able to compare and say yeh or nay but I'd much rather we
> >>>>>>> had some way of knowing genuine from fake (might not be possible and
> >>>>>>> maybe it's irrelevent if I can't tell). At some point I am going to
> >>>>>>> download a 'ripped' multichannel version that I dont actually own
> >>>>>>> (I'll have the CD at least), and I am going to 'trust' it. I'm
> >>>>>>> thinking of all the stuff Napster broadcast with the wrong tags in
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> early days; and things like 'turning Japanese' being associated with
> >>>>>>> The Kinks. Once junk hits the internet there is no stopping it, no
> >>>>>>> hiding it, and no way back! It'll turn up for years.
>
> >>>>>>> ps I have seen folk talk of ripping their SACD when all they are
> >>>>>>> doing is ripping the hybrid part. They're not even trying to fool
> >>>>>>> folk they're just not 100% aware of what they have done. They're not
> >>>>>>> stupid, they're not malicious... just wrong about what they think
> >>>>>>> they're doing. And we can all be wrong about something at some point
> >>>>>>> in our life (many points in mine)..
>
> >>>>>>> pps Brubeck download; It wasn't so much distortion as total break-up.
> >>>>>>> And it was an ISO from another site, played through Foobar on my PC.
> >>>>>>> It was my first 'test' and maybe I need to build a list of trusty
> >>>>>>> sources. You guys and your own control of the Hub will be a far
> >>>>>>> safer, and trusted, environment. That'll be another lesson for me to
> >>>>>>> take onboard.
>
> >>>>>>> Anyway... A big THANK YOU to all the genuine work out there, and I
> >>>>>>> sincerely hope it changes the distribution of music in future. It's
> >>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>> worthy dream surely.
>
> >>>>>>> On Aug 29, 9:13 am, Stephen Disney <sthunderroc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > I'm not sure exactly what you are asking, but I will say that 90%
> >>>>>>> of what is
> >>>>>>> > out there labelled as PS3 SACD rips are in fact ripped as described
> >>>>>>> by known
> >>>>>>> > releasers. There is a guy on rutracker posting assembled ISOs from
> >>>>>>> Pioneer
> >>>>>>> > ripped (special mod) DFF files, but aside from the ISO not being a
> >>>>>>> true
> >>>>>>> > archive of the original, the audio should be identical. Even so,
> >>>>>>> we are
> >>>>>>> > pushing for better labeling. Yes... an I Robot upmix has been
> >>>>>>> posted as
> >>>>>>> > SACD ISO, but that was clearly labelled as an upmix. Again...
> >>>>>>> labelling is
> >>>>>>> > key. Also, a well known pioneer of surround sharing has
> >>>>>>> resurfaced and is
> >>>>>>> > transferring other sources to SACD. Again... labelled.
>
> >>>>>>> > Sure one could try to pass off a fake (but I don't think it would
> >>>>>>> last
> >>>>>>> > long). However, these are legit and the quality is there. Not
> >>>>>>> sure about
> >>>>>>> > your distortion issue.
> >>>>>>> > S
>
> >>>>>>> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:57 AM, pj-mckay <
> >>>>>>> johnmc...@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> > > There's so much of interest here, but most of it is very
> >>>>>>> technical,
> >>>>>>> > > and a lot of followers will be showing a lot of 'faith' in the
> >>>>>>> > > work.
>
> >>>>>>> > > Taking a step back though; Has anyone done much in the way of
> >>>>>>> audio
> >>>>>>> > > comparisons - source to converted quality? Aside from the
> >>>>>>> technical
> >>>>>>> > > differences I like flac as I play mine on a network media player;
> >>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>> > > could use the PC but that's not the way forward and has no
> >>>>>>> commercial
> >>>>>>> > > future IMHO.
>
> >>>>>>> > > I'm not trying to rock the boat but unless the quality is there
> >>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>> > > the start it has little meaning to me and others. No point in
> >>>>>>> hi-res
> >>>>>>> > > noise, jitter, artefacts etc, and we're all aware of a few on
> >>>>>>> > > different recordings. For instance I downloaded the a Dave
> >>>>>>> Brubeck
> >>>>>>> > > album jus to see what it sounded like; stereo seemed fine; 2 of
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> > > multichannel were very distorted and I deleted the lot.
>
> >>>>>>> > > How can we tell we're downloading a good rip and a genuine sacd?
> >>>>>>> Not
> >>>>>>> > > from you guys, but cowboys and kidders will stsart to jump on
> >>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>> > > bandwagon for a giggle. We'll see upmixes, flac conversions of
> >>>>>>> normal
> >>>>>>> > > CDs to higher bitrates. A bit like hi-res vinyl rips, or hi-res
> >>>>>>> quad
> >>>>>>> > > tapes that are clearly past their best..... they've no
> >>>>>>> interest to
> >>>>>>> > > me.
>
> >>>>>>> > > What I'm asking is if there's any danger we are all fooled by
> >>>>>>> some
> >>>>>>> > > joker uploading upmixes, or hi-res rips of a normal CD? Apart
> >>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>> > > having the real sacd I'm not 100% I've got more than 'faith' to
> >>>>>>> rely
> >>>>>>> > > on (apart from corrupt/distorted work thats no use anyway. Just
> >>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>> > > thought.
>
> >>>>>>> > > --
> >>>>>>> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> >>>>>>> Google Groups
> >>>>>>> > > "SurroundSound" group.
> >>>>>>> > > To post to this group, send email to
> >>>>>>> SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
> >>>>>>> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>>>>> > > SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> >>>>>>> > > For more options, visit this group at
> >>>>>>> > >http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound-Hide quoted text -
>
> >>>>>>> > - Show quoted text -
>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>>>>> Groups "SurroundSound" group.
> >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>>>>> SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
No comments:
Post a Comment