Anyway, let me know. Would be happy help you out if I can. - CP
-- -----Original Message-----
From: starmanj <spearse@gmail.com>
To: SurroundSound <surroundsound@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thu, Mar 10, 2011 6:39 am
Subject: [SurroundSound] Better Steely Dans?
To: SurroundSound <surroundsound@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thu, Mar 10, 2011 6:39 am
Subject: [SurroundSound] Better Steely Dans?
I've been a Dan fan since 1972. Would kill to get a good 4-channel version of their work. The Steely Dan quad rips floating around the net and the hub are simply awful. Sounds like the frequencies roll off around 9k hertz. Muddy. Does anyone know of a high-quality sounding multitrack discrete version of their early work? Starmanj -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group. To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
No comments:
Post a Comment