but as it appears that no one can tell the difference between lossy and lossless let alone hi res, who gives about DSD lol
Just to point out, neither I nor anyone else on this thread has said that no one can tell the difference between lossless and lossy. By all means mock me, I don't mind, honestly :)
If I were a recording engineer then I probably would be interested in DSD. But I'm not. Many people feel that high bit rate PCM sounds better than DSD. In fact, as I'm sure you know, both PCM and DSD have advantages and disadvantages. One is not clearly better than the other. Many people cleverer than any of us have pointed this out, including, for example, John Siau of Benchmark Media, Dan Lavry, etc. In actual fact a 24/96 copy of a DSD recording should (if done correctly) be mathematically indistinguishable from the original. The fact is that there is NO scientific basis for claims that DSD is better than high bitrate PCM.
I would argue that if your AVR in the year 2018 A.D. lacks an HDMI port (or two) , it's far from 'perfectly good'.
Meridian Surround Sound Audio Processors are not just perfectly good but extremely good, I can assure you :)
Ali.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to surroundsound+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
No comments:
Post a Comment