Hi OD,
Whilst you may have developed a method to decode SQ that produces good separation, I must disagree that the fronts have been ignored in previous hardware decoders. In fact its well known that SQ hardware decoders have always enhanced both front and rear channel separation to an equal degree. This includes the most basic dynamic front/back blend systems from CBS through to the Tate. The fact you have only now started to look at front/rear separation and dealing with them on an equal basis is quite amazing. You say it is never discussed and Columbia wanted it that way, what utter rubbish, please read the many papers and patents on various variable coefficient decoding systems which includes the Tate and Shadow Vector.
If your decoding run time is so long, I guess you are still using scripts so I'd consider moving to a compiler and writing real code.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to surroundsound+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
No comments:
Post a Comment