"I don't think it's surprising that there's more addiction and depression, just having known what I've gone through on the retirement side," said Muir, who is head of sales for a content marketing platform for financial advisers.
"You've got to imagine something: You played as a kid, you loved this sport and then you were fortunate enough to play this game for 15 years until you're 32 or 35. And, with a flip of a switch, it's turned off and you can't do it anymore," he said.
"I had to go through three different jobs before I found one I wanted, and not everyone has the opportunity and connections I had to be able to get those jobs."
Just as there is more concussion awareness and protocols for player safety today than there were in his early playing days — changes spurred by the experiences of superstars like Eric Lindros and Sidney Crosby — the National Hockey League Players' Association is now doing more to help men cope with retirement from the game, Muir said.
But the life of a professional athlete is rarely an easy one to leave behind.
"I know what I miss about hockey: I miss the pain, I miss the battling, I miss the camaraderie of the guys. There is a sense of addiction to that battling and warrior mentality. I really did enjoy that," Muir said.
"Now, I've been getting a short temper … and I don't know if that's a lack of an outlet or it's a physical or chemical thing. It's hard for me to say that it's because of my NHL career — I got hit in the head and had (multiple) concussions — that now I'm snapping," he said. "I don't know, and that's why this study is so great."
Muir and Thornton hope that over the long term, Levine's work will produce some answers for them and for others.
"What happens when you retire is that you're, quite often, just gone — you don't have access to team doctors or the stuff you had before," Thornton said. "You're just forgotten about, and a lot of us are trying to be proactive (about our health), but it's very difficult to get information, probably in light of the ongoing lawsuits."
Any new concussion research lands smack in the middle of a very polarized, public debate about safety in sport, from children in soccer all the way up to highly paid professionals in contact sports.
More than 100 former NHL players are currently suing the league, alleging it put profits before safety and failed to protect them from head injuries. The league has maintained that it did what it could and science did not demand more measures.
Although many people in the concussion debate, layman and expert alike, have firm views on one side or the other, that's not Levine. He wants science to speak, and when the picture isn't clear or complete, he says so.
"There are sides to the debate and people will probably find support for whatever side they're on in our study, but our study is one study. It's not going to settle any arguments," he said.
But as an objective, long-term study dedicated to finding biomarkers that may be able to explain why some athletes with a history of concussions suffer badly and others don't, it is vital scientific research, said neurosurgeon Dr. Charles Tator, who runs the Canadian Sports Concussion Project.
If there's a way to predict bad outcomes, there may, eventually, be a way to prevent them.
"Unfortunately, we're at the beginning of concussion research," Tator said.
"Longitudinal followup is essential so we can connect the dots. Let's hope the players keep showing up."
Muir's followup testing takes place next year.
"I'm excited to stay in this study and, hopefully, understand how (a history of concussions) affects us later," he said. "That's really the goal of this thing, and only time will tell."
No comments:
Post a Comment