I don't need people to tell me why I cannot hear what I know I hear but to find out why some of us hear things in a different way' and then pass on this to share with others, we need to get back to quality and appreciating the values of real sounds and not the tinnitus of personal audio devices.
As a footnote I remember well the research into PASC and ATRACS both which lead to MP3 - the scientists behind this stated that this would give the same results as a linear recording/playback - who was right? Perhaps though you could even quote evidence to state that MP3 is perfect.
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Steven Sullivan <ssully@panix.com> wrote:
Does it enrage you to know that when researchers study hearing, they don't
accept 'I know what I heard' as sufficient evidence? Would you accuse
them of 'borrowing' others ears, and 'knowing better', on that basis?
If not, why do you keep making such false and inflammatory claims about
what I have written?
> I do not moderate unless the post cites areas such as the hub or slanders
> members personally. Although I personally disagree with Steven because he
> has borrowed my ears and knows better than what I hear myself, with my own
> ears; lol. He is free to have an opinion, So if we differ we do,,, That's
> the great thing with democracy.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
No comments:
Post a Comment