Pages

Saturday, January 8, 2011

Re: [SurroundSound] Re: Hungry for a free meal? Tab's FREE & LEGAL Genius ....

RealA this is lost in our culdture in The UK.
In the UK AM is crap and worse than Mp3 so this is double trouble for us. Stateside a different picture - and intended for cars - so hence why it has been greated os well.


On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 5:47 PM, quadsearcher <sherman2813@hotmail.com> wrote:
It is a window to wonderful alternate universe, where stereo AM made
it into the mainstream in the '70's, and so did quad. It was an actual
radio broadcast and as I understand it, at least one listener played
the AM stereo through a PLII decoder and listened to it in real time.
Sure it would have been nice if the radio station saved it as
"audiophile", but the fact that they saved it at all is great. To me,
at least, this one is more about the whole experience and not about
sound quality. Imagine if someone had a krinkly cassette tape from
1976 (or so) of an encoded pop radio broadcast. The classic AM DJ
patter adds to the charm and at least it sounds better than the
average battered tape from that era. (my tapes anyway). Being fans of
the way radio used to be, my wife and I laughed out loud for hours and
enjoyed finding the differences in the way the songs were mixed. I
wish they made it a regular feature, at least once a year or so.
I found that I did need the center channel on to hear the DJ properly.
btw I think they chose PLII so that there would be more people able to
decode it, you know, the "average" home theater system. Burn them to
standard audio CDs and plop them on the tray.
Tab P:     More please!!!!!!  I really should drop a line to Robb and
the station telling them how much I enjoy it.

On Jan 7, 6:47 pm, Brian Treml <britre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am also confused. I can't play MP3's in surround either. My computer
> does not play my surround material, my surround sound system does.
> Anyone with some advice how us audiophiles are to enjoy these?
>
> On Jan 7, 1:10 pm, Dale <dale...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I must be missing something. How is this supposed to work? I thought
> > maybe the mp3's were made from dts encoded wav files. I used foobar to
> > convert to wav, then tried to run the wav's through foobar again to
> > extract (dts) to multi-channel wav, but still only got 2 channels.
>
> > If these are just stereo tracks that are being processed by Dolby Pro
> > Logic II, then why was Tab Patterson involved? Can someone explain the
> > technology used?
>
> > I haven't tried listening yet through my Home Theatre.
>
> > On Jan 7, 9:27 am, Tab Cursor <tabcur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Lokks,
>
> > > I've always wondered what his feedback was on our recent hub re-master
> > > of WYWH. He's so generous. Did he offer you a kind word?
>
> > > Anibal,
>
> > > Actually, removing atsurround from the DSP list and setting my
> > > receiver's DSP to any of the surround modes worked quite well. Also,
> > > another great FREE player is KMPlayer. It lets you do lots of fun
> > > things with audio output. Also, it's the only player I know of that
> > > will playback DTS wavs without gaps or annoying pops like Foobar.
>
> > > On Jan 7, 12:09 am, Ray Shackleford <mos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Any chance of a playlist for this bad boy?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound

No comments:

Post a Comment