contribute to the monthly cost, which is small for each person, when
spread amongst many members. I think this might be the best solution
in the short term as it keeps the hub on servers we know are OK and
the status quo is preserved.
However, I do think a free solution would be best in the long term.
So my suggestion is to keep it where it is, for now, while we discuss
and sort out the best way to do it free in the near future.
On 4 July, 17:24, Paul Garfunkel <paulgarfun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I see no problem in a subscription based hub. Most of us have been
> paying for rapidshare and that has not worked out so well and this way
> we would have no outside interference.
>
> We could get better service and speed.
>
> On 7/4/10, Lokkerman <phil.steep...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Thanks Grill
> > I will note your comments
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: surroundsound@googlegroups.com [mailto:surroundsound@googlegroups.com]
> > On Behalf Of grill
> > Sent: 04 July 2010 14:02
> > To: SurroundSound
> > Subject: [SurroundSound] Re: Home For The Hub
>
> > Lokks, as I posted before I'm not able to host the Hub. In addition, I'm not
> > competent in Apex stuffs at all. Nevertheless, if necessary I'd temporarily
> > spend a small amount of money to help keep the Hub running, However, imo all
> > of us would most appreciate a free (or an almost free) solution. Anyway, one
> > or some of us should step up and take care of everything.
>
> > On júl. 4, 12:23, "Lokkerman" <phil.steep...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Guys
>
> >> That was a sad day yesterday and all I can say is good luck Glen.
>
> >> Obviously I know Glen quite well and I do know that what he is about
> >> to do is his vocation. Glen has a unique opportunity and the talent
> >> and so seriously must pursue this course. So Wish You Well Glen...
>
> >> Unfortunately because we have not done any succession planning we have
> >> only got a couple of days to put something in place for the hub.
>
> >> I would like everyone to contribute what they would believe to be the
> >> best on this one. Then I will try and reach some kind of consensus
> >> view. I am quite a novice on hosting Apex so I don't really know what
> >> the requirements are, so first of all can someone point me in the
> > direction please?
>
> >> What I do have in mind on a practical level is that we need to really
> >> think about having a couple of assistant ops, in case of the many
> >> scenarios that can and may occur.
>
> >> I am also going to have discussions about how we manage OD's
> >> contribution, maybe a members only ftp server could be the answer as
> >> it is impractical for everyone to be a hub member.
>
> >> Please let this thread be as open minded as possible because now may
> >> be the time to put things in place that could be beneficial to all of us.
>
> >> Cheers
> >> Lokks
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "SurroundSound" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com To
> > unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "SurroundSound" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound
No comments:
Post a Comment