Re: [SurroundSound] Re: EoH New Shares

Exactly the reason why I let my method be measured through an oscilloscope to get rid of phase difference in the Ambisonics part of my method.............

Op dinsdag 7 augustus 2018 10:43:44 UTC+2 schreef OxfordDickie:

I don't normally make comments with regards to 'upmixes', mainly because they always sound false due to the inability for them to follow the natural methods of surround mixing.

What's the "natural" method of surround mixing ??? For me , and I thought that was pretty obvious from some of my remarks, it's not discrete channels, but more an Ambisonics like sound  ! 

There's one issue that i believe i've never seen spoken about when 'upmixing' is discussed, and the fact the last short sentence below makes direct mention of the way we hear, i can only gather that it plays no part in your method.

Phase is an essential part of how we hear, so it doesn't matter that the RMS and Peak values are the same, if their phase is not the same, then it can't be guaranteed that the sounds will sound equal in all situations.

Exactly the reason why I let my method be measured through an oscilloscope to get rid of phase difference in the Ambisonics part of my method............. 

--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To post to this group, send email to SurroundSound@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SurroundSound-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SurroundSound

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SurroundSound" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to surroundsound+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.